<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress 2.9&#8230;.all about media!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thewordpresschick.com/wordpress-29all-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thewordpresschick.com/wordpress-29all-media/</link>
	<description>WordPress tips, training and resources for everyone!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:57:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://thewordpresschick.com/wordpress-29all-media/comment-page-1/#comment-545</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewordpresschick.com/?p=611#comment-545</guid>
		<description>What I&#039;d like to see in this category (Media enhancements) is some sort of enhancement to enable the use of relative links. I haven&#039;t thought this through already, but here&#039;s the scenario I&#039;d like to solve:

1. I use a plug-in like Featured Content Gallery.
2. I know that I can upload to another directory on my web server (and use the URL) but some of the stakeholders who publish content do not have this savvy. Therefore their process is:
  a) click the &quot;gallery&quot; option on a post
  b) upload media (but do NOT place it into the post itself)
  c) copy out the URL, which is a static URL such as http://mysite.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/myimage.jpg
  d) paste this URL into a custom field called &quot;articleimg&quot;

So, this is all fine and dandy.. the link is valid, so the image is found and added to the featured content gallery.

BUT...

I decide that &quot;mysite.com&quot; isn&#039;t a good enough domain name and I move over to &quot;myawesomegreatsite.com&quot;.

Problem? Post content moves... it&#039;s all in the MySQL database. Pages move for the same reason. But now my slider doesn&#039;t work because it&#039;s still looking for the image at &quot;http://mysite.com/etc&quot;.

My only guess for why it&#039;s not already using some sort of relative link scheme (or template_path-based scheme) is that gallery images usually also need to be RSS-friendly.

That&#039;s just a guess. Surely there&#039;s a way they can do this!

Greg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I&#8217;d like to see in this category (Media enhancements) is some sort of enhancement to enable the use of relative links. I haven&#8217;t thought this through already, but here&#8217;s the scenario I&#8217;d like to solve:</p>
<p>1. I use a plug-in like Featured Content Gallery.<br />
2. I know that I can upload to another directory on my web server (and use the URL) but some of the stakeholders who publish content do not have this savvy. Therefore their process is:<br />
  a) click the &#8220;gallery&#8221; option on a post<br />
  b) upload media (but do NOT place it into the post itself)<br />
  c) copy out the URL, which is a static URL such as <a href="http://mysite.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/myimage.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://mysite.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/myimage.jpg</a><br />
  d) paste this URL into a custom field called &#8220;articleimg&#8221;</p>
<p>So, this is all fine and dandy.. the link is valid, so the image is found and added to the featured content gallery.</p>
<p>BUT&#8230;</p>
<p>I decide that &#8220;mysite.com&#8221; isn&#8217;t a good enough domain name and I move over to &#8220;myawesomegreatsite.com&#8221;.</p>
<p>Problem? Post content moves&#8230; it&#8217;s all in the MySQL database. Pages move for the same reason. But now my slider doesn&#8217;t work because it&#8217;s still looking for the image at &#8220;http://mysite.com/etc&#8221;.</p>
<p>My only guess for why it&#8217;s not already using some sort of relative link scheme (or template_path-based scheme) is that gallery images usually also need to be RSS-friendly.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just a guess. Surely there&#8217;s a way they can do this!</p>
<p>Greg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
